To use the latest Nuxt build and test features before their release, read about the [nightly release channel](/docs/guide/going-further/nightly-release-channel) guide.
## Testing Nuxt 4
Nuxt 4 is planned to be released **on or before June 14** (though obviously this is dependent on having enough time after Nitro's major release to be properly tested in the community, so be aware that this is not an exact date).
When you set your `compatibilityVersion` to `4`, defaults throughout your Nuxt configuration will change to opt in to Nuxt v4 behavior, but you can granularly re-enable Nuxt v3 behavior when testing, following the commented out lines above. Please file issues if so, so that we can address them in Nuxt or in the ecosystem.
### Migrating to Nuxt 4
Breaking or significant changes will be noted here along with migration steps for backward/forward compatibility.
::alert
This section is subject to change until the final release, so please check back here regularly if you are testing Nuxt 4 using `compatibilityVersion: 4`.
::
#### New Directory Structure
🚦 **Impact Level**: Significant
Nuxt now defaults to a new directory structure, with backwards compatibility (so if Nuxt detects you are using the old structure, such as with a top-level `pages/` directory, this new structure will not apply).
👉 [See full RFC](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/issues/26444)
##### What Changed
* the new Nuxt default `srcDir` is `app/` by default, and most things are resolved from there.
*`serverDir` now defaults to `<rootDir>/server` rather than `<srcDir>/server`
*`modules` and `public` are resolved relative to `<rootDir>` by default
* a new `dir.app` is added, which is the directory we look for `router.options.ts` and `spa-loading-template.html` - this defaults to `<srcDir>/`
<details>
<summary>An example v4 folder structure.</summary>
👉 For more details, see the [PR implementing this change](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/pull/27029).
##### Reasons for Change
1.**Performance** - placing all your code in the root of your repo causes issues with `.git/` and `node_modules/` folders being scanned/included by FS watchers which can significantly delay startup on non-Mac OSes.
1.**IDE type-safety** - `server/` and the rest of your app are running in two entirely different contexts with different global imports available, and making sure `server/` isn't _inside_ the same folder as the rest of your app is a big first step to ensuring you get good auto-completes in your IDE.
1. Move your `assets/`, `components/`, `composables/`, `layouts/`, `middleware/`, `pages/`, `plugins/` and `utils/` folders under it, as well as `app.vue`, `error.vue`, `app.config.ts`. If you have an `app/router-options.ts` or `app/spa-loading-template.html`, these paths remain the same.
However, migration is _not required_. If you wish to keep your current folder structure, Nuxt should auto-detect it. (If it does not, please raise an issue.) The one exception is that if you _already_ have a custom `srcDir`. In this case, you should be aware that your `modules/`, `public/` and `server/` folders will be resolved from your `rootDir` rather than from your custom `srcDir`. You can override this by configuring `dir.modules`, `dir.public` and `serverDir` if you need to.
You can also force a v3 folder structure with the following configuration:
We enabled a previously experimental feature to share data from `useAsyncData` and `useFetch` calls, across different pages. See [original PR](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/pull/24894).
##### Reasons for Change
This feature automatically shares payload _data_ between pages that are prerendered. This can result in a significant performance improvement when prerendering sites that use `useAsyncData` or `useFetch` and fetch the same data in different pages.
For example, if your site requires a `useFetch` call for every page (for example, to get navigation data for a menu, or site settings from a CMS), this data would only be fetched once when prerendering the first page that uses it, and then cached for use when prerendering other pages.
##### Migration Steps
Make sure that any unique key of your data is always resolvable to the same data. For example, if you are using `useAsyncData` to fetch data related to a particular page, you should provide a key that uniquely matches that data. (`useFetch` should do this automatically for you.)
```ts [app/pages/test/[slug\\].vue]
// This would be unsafe in a dynamic page (e.g. `[slug].vue`) because the route slug makes a difference
// to the data fetched, but Nuxt can't know that because it's not reflected in the key.
#### Default `data` and `error` values in `useAsyncData` and `useFetch`
🚦 **Impact Level**: Minimal
##### What Changed
`data` and `error` objects returned from `useAsyncData` will now default to `undefined`.
##### Reasons for Change
Previously `data` was initialized to `null` but reset in `clearNuxtData` to `undefined`. `error` was initialized to `null`. This change is to bring greater consistency.
##### Migration Steps
If you encounter any issues you can revert back to the previous behavior with:
The issue came up when adding `dedupe` as an option to `useAsyncData`, and we removed the boolean values as they ended up being _opposites_.
`refresh({ dedupe: false })` meant 'do not _cancel_ existing requests in favour of this new one'. But passing `dedupe: true` within the options of `useAsyncData` means 'do not make any new requests if there is an existing pending request.' (See [PR](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/pull/24564#pullrequestreview-1764584361).)
#### Respect defaults when clearing `data` in `useAsyncData` and `useFetch`
🚦 **Impact Level**: Minimal
##### What Changed
If you provide a custom `default` value for `useAsyncData`, this will now be used when calling `clear` or `clearNuxtData` and it will be reset to its default value rather than simply unset.
##### Reasons for Change
Often users set an appropriately empty value, such as an empty array, to avoid the need to check for `null`/`undefined` when iterating over it. This should be respected when resetting/clearing the data.
##### Migration Steps
If you encounter any issues you can revert back to the previous behavior, for now, with:
#### Shallow Data Reactivity in `useAsyncData` and `useFetch`
🚦 **Impact Level**: Minimal
The `data` object returned from `useAsyncData`, `useFetch`, `useLazyAsyncData` and `useLazyFetch` is now a `shallowRef` rather than a `ref`.
##### What Changed
When new data is fetched, anything depending on `data` will still be reactive because the entire object is replaced. But if your code changes a property _within_ that data structure, this will not trigger any reactivity in your app.
##### Reasons for Change
This brings a **significant** performance improvement for deeply nested objects and arrays because Vue does not need to watch every single property/array for modification. In most cases, `data` should also be immutable.
##### Migration Steps
In most cases, no migration steps are required, but if you rely on the reactivity of the data object then you have two options:
1. You can granularly opt in to deep reactivity on a per-composable basis:
The Nuxt `builder:watch` hook now emits a path which is absolute rather than relative to your project `srcDir`.
##### Reasons for Change
This allows us to support watching paths which are outside your `srcDir`, and offers better support for layers and other more complex patterns.
##### Migration Steps
We have already proactively migrated the public Nuxt modules which we are aware use this hook. See [issue #25339](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/issues/25339).
However, if you are a module author using the `builder:watch` hook and wishing to remain backwards/forwards compatible, you can use the following code to ensure that your code works the same in both Nuxt v3 and Nuxt v4:
We are removing the global `window.__NUXT__` object after the app finishes hydration.
##### Reasons for Change
This opens the way to multi-app patterns ([#21635](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/issues/21635)) and enables us to focus on a single way to access Nuxt app data - `useNuxtApp()`.
##### Migration Steps
The data is still available, but can be accessed with `useNuxtApp().payload`:
Previously, Nuxt used `lodash/template` to compile templates located on the file system using the `.ejs` file format/syntax.
In addition, we provided some template utilities (`serialize`, `importName`, `importSources`) which could be used for code-generation within these templates, which are now being removed.
##### Reasons for Change
In Nuxt v3 we moved to a 'virtual' syntax with a `getContents()` function which is much more flexible and performant.
In addition, `lodash/template` has had a succession of security issues. These do not really apply to Nuxt projects because it is being used at build-time, not runtime, and by trusted code. However, they still appear in security audits. Moreover, `lodash` is a hefty dependency and is unused by most projects.
Finally, providing code serialization functions directly within Nuxt is not ideal. Instead, we maintain projects like [unjs/knitwork](http://github.com/unjs/knitwork) which can be dependencies of your project, and where security issues can be reported/resolved directly without requiring an upgrade of Nuxt itself.
##### Migration Steps
We have raised PRs to update modules using EJS syntax, but if you need to do this yourself, you have three backwards/forwards-compatible alternatives:
* Moving your string interpolation logic directly into `getContents()`.
* Using a custom function to handle the replacement, such as in https://github.com/nuxt-modules/color-mode/pull/240.
* Continuing to use `lodash`, as a dependency of _your_ project rather than Nuxt:
Finally, if you are using the template utilities (`serialize`, `importName`, `importSources`), you can replace them as follows with utilities from `knitwork`:
```ts
import { genDynamicImport, genImport, genSafeVariableName } from 'knitwork'
These options have been set to their current values for some time and we do not have a reason to believe that they need to remain configurable.
##### Migration Steps
*`polyfillVueUseHead` is implementable in user-land with [this plugin](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/blob/f209158352b09d1986aa320e29ff36353b91c358/packages/nuxt/src/head/runtime/plugins/vueuse-head-polyfill.ts#L10-L11)
*`respectNoSSRHeader`is implementable in user-land with [server middleware](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/blob/c660b39447f0d5b8790c0826092638d321cd6821/packages/nuxt/src/core/runtime/nitro/no-ssr.ts#L8-L9)
If you prefer to progressively migrate your Nuxt 2 application to Nuxt 3, you can use Nuxt Bridge. Nuxt Bridge is a compatibility layer that allows you to use Nuxt 3 features in Nuxt 2 with an opt-in mechanism.