Zengtudor/pybind11
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/pybind/pybind11.git synced 2024-11-22 05:05:11 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #255 from nafur/patch-1

Browse Source 
Added warning about same-address-optimization
This commit is contained in:
Wenzel Jakob 2016-06-30 14:48:29 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 09e22b4a17
1 changed files with 10 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
docs/advanced.rst
View File

@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ functions. The default policy is :enum:`return_value_policy::automatic`.
| :enum:`return_value_policy::take_ownership` | Reference an existing object (i.e. do not create a new copy) and take |
| | ownership. Python will call the destructor and delete operator when the |
| | object's reference count reaches zero. Undefined behavior ensues when the |
| | C++ side does the same.. |
| | C++ side does the same. |
+--------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| :enum:`return_value_policy::copy` | Create a new copy of the returned object, which will be owned by Python. |
| | This policy is comparably safe because the lifetimes of the two instances |
@ -526,6 +526,15 @@ The following example snippet shows a use case of the
non-determinism and segmentation faults, hence it is worth spending the
time to understand all the different options in the table above.
.. warning::
pybind11 tries to eliminate duplicate addresses by returning the same reference object.
If two addresses are the same, though they do not point to the same object semantically,
this may cause unexpected behaviour. An explicit policy should be used instead of
relying on `automatic`.
A common example is a reference to the first member of a class which has the same memory
location as its owning class.
.. note::
The next section on :ref:`call_policies` discusses *call policies* that can be