Clarify GIL documentation (#4057)

This commit is contained in:
Dustin Spicuzza 2022-09-14 17:00:27 -04:00 committed by GitHub
parent 8524b20c3c
commit 1874f8fa87
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -39,15 +39,42 @@ The ``PYBIND11_MAKE_OPAQUE`` macro does *not* require the above workarounds.
Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) Global Interpreter Lock (GIL)
============================= =============================
When calling a C++ function from Python, the GIL is always held. The Python C API dictates that the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) must always
be held by the current thread to safely access Python objects. As a result,
when Python calls into C++ via pybind11 the GIL must be held, and pybind11
will never implicitly release the GIL.
.. code-block:: cpp
void my_function() {
/* GIL is held when this function is called from Python */
}
PYBIND11_MODULE(example, m) {
m.def("my_function", &my_function);
}
pybind11 will ensure that the GIL is held when it knows that it is calling
Python code. For example, if a Python callback is passed to C++ code via
``std::function``, when C++ code calls the function the built-in wrapper
will acquire the GIL before calling the Python callback. Similarly, the
``PYBIND11_OVERRIDE`` family of macros will acquire the GIL before calling
back into Python.
When writing C++ code that is called from other C++ code, if that code accesses
Python state, it must explicitly acquire and release the GIL.
The classes :class:`gil_scoped_release` and :class:`gil_scoped_acquire` can be The classes :class:`gil_scoped_release` and :class:`gil_scoped_acquire` can be
used to acquire and release the global interpreter lock in the body of a C++ used to acquire and release the global interpreter lock in the body of a C++
function call. In this way, long-running C++ code can be parallelized using function call. In this way, long-running C++ code can be parallelized using
multiple Python threads. Taking :ref:`overriding_virtuals` as an example, this multiple Python threads, **but great care must be taken** when any
:class:`gil_scoped_release` appear: if there is any way that the C++ code
can access Python objects, :class:`gil_scoped_acquire` should be used to
reacquire the GIL. Taking :ref:`overriding_virtuals` as an example, this
could be realized as follows (important changes highlighted): could be realized as follows (important changes highlighted):
.. code-block:: cpp .. code-block:: cpp
:emphasize-lines: 8,9,31,32 :emphasize-lines: 8,30,31
class PyAnimal : public Animal { class PyAnimal : public Animal {
public: public:
@ -56,9 +83,7 @@ could be realized as follows (important changes highlighted):
/* Trampoline (need one for each virtual function) */ /* Trampoline (need one for each virtual function) */
std::string go(int n_times) { std::string go(int n_times) {
/* Acquire GIL before calling Python code */ /* PYBIND11_OVERRIDE_PURE will acquire the GIL before accessing Python state */
py::gil_scoped_acquire acquire;
PYBIND11_OVERRIDE_PURE( PYBIND11_OVERRIDE_PURE(
std::string, /* Return type */ std::string, /* Return type */
Animal, /* Parent class */ Animal, /* Parent class */
@ -78,7 +103,8 @@ could be realized as follows (important changes highlighted):
.def(py::init<>()); .def(py::init<>());
m.def("call_go", [](Animal *animal) -> std::string { m.def("call_go", [](Animal *animal) -> std::string {
/* Release GIL before calling into (potentially long-running) C++ code */ // GIL is held when called from Python code. Release GIL before
// calling into (potentially long-running) C++ code
py::gil_scoped_release release; py::gil_scoped_release release;
return call_go(animal); return call_go(animal);
}); });