Enable unique_ptr holder with mixed Deleters between base and derived types (#1353)

* Check default holder

-Recognize "std::unique_ptr<T, D>" as a default holder even if "D" doesn't match between base and derived holders

* Add test for unique_ptr<T, D> change
This commit is contained in:
Trevor Laughlin 2018-11-11 13:36:55 -05:00 committed by Wenzel Jakob
parent cea42467b0
commit 63c2a972fe
3 changed files with 48 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ public:
record.holder_size = sizeof(holder_type);
record.init_instance = init_instance;
record.dealloc = dealloc;
record.default_holder = std::is_same<holder_type, std::unique_ptr<type>>::value;
record.default_holder = detail::is_instantiation<std::unique_ptr, holder_type>::value;
set_operator_new<type>(&record);

View File

@ -186,6 +186,32 @@ TEST_SUBMODULE(smart_ptr, m) {
.def(py::init<int>())
.def_readwrite("value", &MyObject4::value);
// test_unique_deleter
// Object with std::unique_ptr<T, D> where D is not matching the base class
// Object with a protected destructor
class MyObject4a {
public:
MyObject4a(int i) {
value = i;
print_created(this);
};
int value;
protected:
virtual ~MyObject4a() { print_destroyed(this); }
};
py::class_<MyObject4a, std::unique_ptr<MyObject4a, py::nodelete>>(m, "MyObject4a")
.def(py::init<int>())
.def_readwrite("value", &MyObject4a::value);
// Object derived but with public destructor and no Deleter in default holder
class MyObject4b : public MyObject4a {
public:
MyObject4b(int i) : MyObject4a(i) { print_created(this); }
~MyObject4b() { print_destroyed(this); }
};
py::class_<MyObject4b, MyObject4a>(m, "MyObject4b")
.def(py::init<int>());
// test_large_holder
class MyObject5 { // managed by huge_unique_ptr
public:

View File

@ -115,6 +115,27 @@ def test_unique_nodelete():
assert cstats.alive() == 1 # Leak, but that's intentional
def test_unique_nodelete4a():
o = m.MyObject4a(23)
assert o.value == 23
cstats = ConstructorStats.get(m.MyObject4a)
assert cstats.alive() == 1
del o
assert cstats.alive() == 1 # Leak, but that's intentional
def test_unique_deleter():
o = m.MyObject4b(23)
assert o.value == 23
cstats4a = ConstructorStats.get(m.MyObject4a)
assert cstats4a.alive() == 2 # Two becaue of previous test
cstats4b = ConstructorStats.get(m.MyObject4b)
assert cstats4b.alive() == 1
del o
assert cstats4a.alive() == 1 # Should now only be one leftover from previous test
assert cstats4b.alive() == 0 # Should be deleted
def test_large_holder():
o = m.MyObject5(5)
assert o.value == 5