Zengtudor
/
pybind11
mirror of https://github.com/pybind/pybind11.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Inconsistent comments between 2 templates of `unchecked()`. (#4519) 

This comment is unrelated to having T in tparam or not.
Probably a typo.
Copied the correct one here.

Resolve https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/issues/4518
This commit is contained in:
xkszltl 2023-02-21 06:58:37 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 68211d41c1
commit a19daeac16
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
include/pybind11/numpy.h
View File

@ -1121,10 +1121,10 @@ public:
/**
* Returns a proxy object that provides const access to the array's data without bounds or
* dimensionality checking. Unlike `unchecked()`, this does not require that the underlying
* array have the `writable` flag. Use with care: the array must not be destroyed or reshaped
* for the duration of the returned object, and the caller must take care not to access invalid
* dimensions or dimension indices.
* dimensionality checking. Unlike `mutable_unchecked()`, this does not require that the
* underlying array have the `writable` flag. Use with care: the array must not be destroyed
* or reshaped for the duration of the returned object, and the caller must take care not to
* access invalid dimensions or dimension indices.
*/
template <ssize_t Dims = -1>
detail::unchecked_reference<T, Dims> unchecked() const & {