mirror of
https://github.com/pybind/pybind11.git
synced 2024-11-22 05:05:11 +00:00
Directly compare 3 ways of moving data between C++ and Python
This commit is contained in:
parent
67b52d808e
commit
f0b0df58a9
@ -1,5 +1,74 @@
|
||||
Casting data types
|
||||
##################
|
||||
Type conversions
|
||||
################
|
||||
|
||||
There are 3 mechanisms that pybind11 uses to move data between C++ and Python.
|
||||
We'll take a quick look at each one to get an overview of what's happening.
|
||||
|
||||
.. rubric:: 1. Native type in C++, wrapper in Python
|
||||
|
||||
Exposing a custom C++ type using :class:`py::class_` was covered in detail in
|
||||
the :doc:`/classes` section. There, the underlying data structure is always the
|
||||
original C++ class while the :class:`py::class_` wrapper provides a Python
|
||||
interface. Internally, when an object like this is sent from C++ to Python,
|
||||
pybind11 will just add the outer wrapper layer over the native C++ object.
|
||||
Getting it back from Python is just a matter of peeling off the wrapper.
|
||||
|
||||
.. rubric:: 2. Wrapper in C++, native type in Python
|
||||
|
||||
This is the exact opposite situation. Now, we have a type which is native to
|
||||
Python, like a ``tuple`` or a ``list``. One way to get this data into C++ is
|
||||
with the :class:`py::object` family of wrappers. These are explained in more
|
||||
detail in the :doc:`/advanced/pycpp/object` section. We'll just give a quick
|
||||
example here:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: cpp
|
||||
|
||||
void print_list(py::list my_list) {
|
||||
for (auto item : my_list)
|
||||
std::cout << item << " ";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: pycon
|
||||
|
||||
>>> print_list([1, 2, 3])
|
||||
1 2 3
|
||||
|
||||
The Python ``list`` is not converted in any way -- it's just wrapped in a C++
|
||||
:class:`py::list` class. At its core it's still a Python object. Copying a
|
||||
:class:`py::list` will do the usual reference-counting like in Python.
|
||||
Returning the object to Python will just remove the thin wrapper.
|
||||
|
||||
.. rubric:: 3. Converting between native C++ and Python types
|
||||
|
||||
In the previous two cases we had a native type in one language and a wrapper in
|
||||
the other. Now, we have native types on both sides and we convert between them.
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: cpp
|
||||
|
||||
void print_vector(const std::vector<int> &v) {
|
||||
for (auto item : v)
|
||||
std::cout << item << "\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: pycon
|
||||
|
||||
>>> print_vector([1, 2, 3])
|
||||
1 2 3
|
||||
|
||||
In this case, pybind11 will construct a new ``std::vector<int>`` and copy each
|
||||
element from the Python ``list``. The newly constructed object will be passed
|
||||
to ``print_vector``. The same thing happens in the other direction: a new
|
||||
``list`` is made to match the value returned from C++.
|
||||
|
||||
Lots of these conversions are supported out of the box, as shown in the table
|
||||
below. They are very convenient, but keep in mind that these conversions are
|
||||
fundamentally based on copying data. This is perfectly fine for small immutable
|
||||
types but it may become quite expensive for large data structures. This can be
|
||||
avoided by overriding the automatic conversion with a custom wrapper (i.e. the
|
||||
above-mentioned approach 1). This requires some manual effort and more details
|
||||
are available in the :ref:`opaque` section.
|
||||
|
||||
.. rubric:: Supported automatic conversions
|
||||
|
||||
.. toctree::
|
||||
:maxdepth: 1
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user