Miscellaneous ############# .. _macro_notes: General notes regarding convenience macros ========================================== pybind11 provides a few convenience macros such as :func:`PYBIND11_MAKE_OPAQUE` and :func:`PYBIND11_DECLARE_HOLDER_TYPE`, and ``PYBIND11_OVERLOAD_*``. Since these are "just" macros that are evaluated in the preprocessor (which has no concept of types), they *will* get confused by commas in a template argument such as ``PYBIND11_OVERLOAD(MyReturnValue, myFunc)``. In this case, the preprocessor assumes that the comma indicates the beginning of the next parameter. Use a ``typedef`` to bind the template to another name and use it in the macro to avoid this problem. .. _gil: Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) ============================= When calling a C++ function from Python, the GIL is always held. The classes :class:`gil_scoped_release` and :class:`gil_scoped_acquire` can be used to acquire and release the global interpreter lock in the body of a C++ function call. In this way, long-running C++ code can be parallelized using multiple Python threads. Taking :ref:`overriding_virtuals` as an example, this could be realized as follows (important changes highlighted): .. code-block:: cpp :emphasize-lines: 8,9,33,34 class PyAnimal : public Animal { public: /* Inherit the constructors */ using Animal::Animal; /* Trampoline (need one for each virtual function) */ std::string go(int n_times) { /* Acquire GIL before calling Python code */ py::gil_scoped_acquire acquire; PYBIND11_OVERLOAD_PURE( std::string, /* Return type */ Animal, /* Parent class */ go, /* Name of function */ n_times /* Argument(s) */ ); } }; PYBIND11_PLUGIN(example) { py::module m("example", "pybind11 example plugin"); py::class_ animal(m, "Animal"); animal .def(py::init<>()) .def("go", &Animal::go); py::class_(m, "Dog", animal) .def(py::init<>()); m.def("call_go", [](Animal *animal) -> std::string { /* Release GIL before calling into (potentially long-running) C++ code */ py::gil_scoped_release release; return call_go(animal); }); return m.ptr(); } The ``call_go`` wrapper can also be simplified using the `call_guard` policy (see :ref:`call_policies`) which yields the same result: .. code-block:: cpp m.def("call_go", &call_go, py::call_guard()); Binding sequence data types, iterators, the slicing protocol, etc. ================================================================== Please refer to the supplemental example for details. .. seealso:: The file :file:`tests/test_sequences_and_iterators.cpp` contains a complete example that shows how to bind a sequence data type, including length queries (``__len__``), iterators (``__iter__``), the slicing protocol and other kinds of useful operations. Partitioning code over multiple extension modules ================================================= It's straightforward to split binding code over multiple extension modules, while referencing types that are declared elsewhere. Everything "just" works without any special precautions. One exception to this rule occurs when extending a type declared in another extension module. Recall the basic example from Section :ref:`inheritance`. .. code-block:: cpp py::class_ pet(m, "Pet"); pet.def(py::init()) .def_readwrite("name", &Pet::name); py::class_(m, "Dog", pet /* <- specify parent */) .def(py::init()) .def("bark", &Dog::bark); Suppose now that ``Pet`` bindings are defined in a module named ``basic``, whereas the ``Dog`` bindings are defined somewhere else. The challenge is of course that the variable ``pet`` is not available anymore though it is needed to indicate the inheritance relationship to the constructor of ``class_``. However, it can be acquired as follows: .. code-block:: cpp py::object pet = (py::object) py::module::import("basic").attr("Pet"); py::class_(m, "Dog", pet) .def(py::init()) .def("bark", &Dog::bark); Alternatively, you can specify the base class as a template parameter option to ``class_``, which performs an automated lookup of the corresponding Python type. Like the above code, however, this also requires invoking the ``import`` function once to ensure that the pybind11 binding code of the module ``basic`` has been executed: .. code-block:: cpp py::module::import("basic"); py::class_(m, "Dog") .def(py::init()) .def("bark", &Dog::bark); Naturally, both methods will fail when there are cyclic dependencies. Note that compiling code which has its default symbol visibility set to *hidden* (e.g. via the command line flag ``-fvisibility=hidden`` on GCC/Clang) can interfere with the ability to access types defined in another extension module. Workarounds include changing the global symbol visibility (not recommended, because it will lead unnecessarily large binaries) or manually exporting types that are accessed by multiple extension modules: .. code-block:: cpp #ifdef _WIN32 # define EXPORT_TYPE __declspec(dllexport) #else # define EXPORT_TYPE __attribute__ ((visibility("default"))) #endif class EXPORT_TYPE Dog : public Animal { ... }; Note also that it is possible (although would rarely be required) to share arbitrary C++ objects between extension modules at runtime. Internal library data is shared between modules using capsule machinery [#f6]_ which can be also utilized for storing, modifying and accessing user-defined data. Note that an extension module will "see" other extensions' data if and only if they were built with the same pybind11 version. Consider the following example: .. code-block:: cpp auto data = (MyData *) py::get_shared_data("mydata"); if (!data) data = (MyData *) py::set_shared_data("mydata", new MyData(42)); If the above snippet was used in several separately compiled extension modules, the first one to be imported would create a ``MyData`` instance and associate a ``"mydata"`` key with a pointer to it. Extensions that are imported later would be then able to access the data behind the same pointer. .. [#f6] https://docs.python.org/3/extending/extending.html#using-capsules Module Destructors ================== pybind11 does not provide an explicit mechanism to invoke cleanup code at module destruction time. In rare cases where such functionality is required, it is possible to emulate it using Python capsules with a destruction callback. .. code-block:: cpp auto cleanup_callback = []() { // perform cleanup here -- this function is called with the GIL held }; m.add_object("_cleanup", py::capsule(cleanup_callback)); Generating documentation using Sphinx ===================================== Sphinx [#f4]_ has the ability to inspect the signatures and documentation strings in pybind11-based extension modules to automatically generate beautiful documentation in a variety formats. The python_example repository [#f5]_ contains a simple example repository which uses this approach. There are two potential gotchas when using this approach: first, make sure that the resulting strings do not contain any :kbd:`TAB` characters, which break the docstring parsing routines. You may want to use C++11 raw string literals, which are convenient for multi-line comments. Conveniently, any excess indentation will be automatically be removed by Sphinx. However, for this to work, it is important that all lines are indented consistently, i.e.: .. code-block:: cpp // ok m.def("foo", &foo, R"mydelimiter( The foo function Parameters ---------- )mydelimiter"); // *not ok* m.def("foo", &foo, R"mydelimiter(The foo function Parameters ---------- )mydelimiter"); By default, pybind11 automatically generates and prepends a signature to the docstring of a function registered with ``module::def()`` and ``class_::def()``. Sometimes this behavior is not desirable, because you want to provide your own signature or remove the docstring completely to exclude the function from the Sphinx documentation. The class ``options`` allows you to selectively suppress auto-generated signatures: .. code-block:: cpp PYBIND11_PLUGIN(example) { py::module m("example", "pybind11 example plugin"); py::options options; options.disable_function_signatures(); m.def("add", [](int a, int b) { return a + b; }, "A function which adds two numbers"); return m.ptr(); } Note that changes to the settings affect only function bindings created during the lifetime of the ``options`` instance. When it goes out of scope at the end of the module's init function, the default settings are restored to prevent unwanted side effects. .. [#f4] http://www.sphinx-doc.org .. [#f5] http://github.com/pybind/python_example