The current integer caster was unnecessarily strict and rejected
various kinds of NumPy integer types when calling C++ functions
expecting normal integers. This relaxes the current behavior.
Currently pybind11 doesn't check when you define a new object (e.g. a
class, function, or exception) that overwrites an existing one. If the
thing being overwritten is a class, this leads to a segfault (because
pybind still thinks the type is defined, even though Python no longer
has the type). In other cases this is harmless (e.g. replacing a
function with an exception), but even in that case it's most likely a
bug.
This code doesn't prevent you from actively doing something harmful,
like deliberately overwriting a previous definition, but detects
overwriting with a run-time error if it occurs in the standard
class/function/exception/def registration interfaces.
All of the additions are in non-template code; the result is actually a
tiny decrease in .so size compared to master without the new test code
(977304 to 977272 bytes), and about 4K higher with the new tests.
type_caster_generic::cast(): The values of
wrapper->value
wrapper->owned
are incorrect in the case that a return value policy of 'copy' is
requested but there is no copy-constructor. (Similarly 'move'.) In
particular, if the source object is a static instance, the destructor of
the 'object' 'inst' leads to class_::dealloc() which incorrectly
attempts to 'delete' the static instance.
This commit re-arranges the code to be clearer as to what the values of
'value' and 'owned' should be in the various cases. Behaviour is
different to previous code only in two situations:
policy = copy but no copy-ctor: Old code leaves 'value = src, owned =
true', which leads to trouble. New code leaves 'value = nullptr, owned
= false', which is correct.
policy = move but no move- or copy-ctor: old code leaves 'value = src,
owned = true', which leads to trouble. New code leaves 'value =
nullptr, owned = false', which is correct.
With this there is no more need for manual user declarations like
`PYBIND11_DECLARE_HOLDER_TYPE(T, std::shared_ptr<T>)`. Existing ones
will still compile without error -- they will just be ignored silently.
Resolves#446.
This prevents unwanted conversions to bool or int such as:
```
py::object my_object;
std::cout << my_object << std::endl; // compiles and prints 0 or 1
int n = my_object; // compiles and is nonsense
```
With `explicit operator bool()` the above cases become compiler errors.
We have various classes that have non-explicit constructors that accept
a single argument, which is implicitly making them implicitly
convertible from the argument. In a few cases, this is desirable (e.g.
implicit conversion of std::string to py::str, or conversion of double
to py::float_); in many others, however, it is unintended (e.g. implicit
conversion of size_t to some pre-declared py::array_t<T> type).
This disables most of the unwanted implicit conversions by marking them
`explicit`, and comments the ones that are deliberately left implicit.
This convenience function ensures that a py::object is either a
py::array, or the implementation will try to convert it into one. Layout
requirements (such as c_style or f_style) can be also be provided.
